Invisible Planets
16 Jul 2019 21:03![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
extrapenguinSo! I finally finished the anthology Invisible Planets: 13 Visions of the Future from China, ed. and tr. Ken Liu. The stories were good, and I appreciate reading it. I have some thoughts!
Firstly, the byline calls it an anthology of contemporary Chinese science fiction. I wouldn't actually class that many of the stories as science fiction – a lot of them were more fantasy/mythology/hard to classify. Chinese Weird, if you will. (In analogy with Finnish Weird.) This is not necessarily a negative, merely misleading marketing (just like the marketing that called The Three-Body Problem hard SF when it imo isn't).
Secondly, the stories all had very similar tones. I don't know if Ken Liu has very particular likes or whether Chinese SF is all like this, but: it was all a bit dark and had a thread of focusing on the futility of existence/victory of entropy; no-one won big, everyone either lost or continued on trudging as they were. It's a tone not that easy to describe but also very familiar – it's ubiquitous in Finnish SF! You could've slotted something by someone like Shimo Suntila right in and I don't think I'd have even noticed. I'm trying to figure out whether there's some parallel tonal evolution going on for whatever reason, or whether Anglophone SF is just the outlier.
I still have some essays at the back to read about Chinese SF (by authors featured in the collection), but I figured those'll take me another few months to get to (*g*) so I had better post this now.
Firstly, the byline calls it an anthology of contemporary Chinese science fiction. I wouldn't actually class that many of the stories as science fiction – a lot of them were more fantasy/mythology/hard to classify. Chinese Weird, if you will. (In analogy with Finnish Weird.) This is not necessarily a negative, merely misleading marketing (just like the marketing that called The Three-Body Problem hard SF when it imo isn't).
Secondly, the stories all had very similar tones. I don't know if Ken Liu has very particular likes or whether Chinese SF is all like this, but: it was all a bit dark and had a thread of focusing on the futility of existence/victory of entropy; no-one won big, everyone either lost or continued on trudging as they were. It's a tone not that easy to describe but also very familiar – it's ubiquitous in Finnish SF! You could've slotted something by someone like Shimo Suntila right in and I don't think I'd have even noticed. I'm trying to figure out whether there's some parallel tonal evolution going on for whatever reason, or whether Anglophone SF is just the outlier.
I still have some essays at the back to read about Chinese SF (by authors featured in the collection), but I figured those'll take me another few months to get to (*g*) so I had better post this now.
no subject
Date: 2019-07-16 20:30 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-07-16 20:40 (UTC)