![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
extrapenguinSo, recentishly I read some meta, almost 15 years old, about (in essence) how much written-out emotion people like in their fic. Now, I don't think I'm a cold prickly who wants everything to be in code one has to decipher, or a warm fuzzy who's all about explicitly describing every emotion – but then again, if this is a scale from 0 to 100, I'm pretty sure everyone between 10 and 90 is convinced they're roughly at the middle. *g*
(More notes: there was a lot of talk about what slash is for, which to be is a bit nonsensical as a question – slash is a category of fanfic, and fic isn't for one single thing. This was an interesting generational divide!)
Then I thought some more about it, and I think I lost the intermediate stepping stones, but what I came at was: expressions of love. IDK how it is in America, but here, no-one says "I love you". Affection and care is turning up, cooking, talking about tractors. We are an emotionally constipated people.
Ah yes, now I remember the bridge for the donkey-cart of thought! It was related to the actions of characters versus the internal monologue. So: I guess that the line in the sand I draw is that the characters' actions remain as in canon, but the act of fic-writing for a visual medium is already decoding some of that everything. As long as the characters' actions are as in canon, the internal monologue can be filled in at will. (It's a bit different for text-based things that are from the canon narrator's POV. But there we have a clearer target to emulate.)
And because this is a post composed of thread-ends I can't quite weave into a blanket, let me bring in Guardian as well! Some of this is probably my personal cultural baggage, as I'm not Chinese, but I honestly never could believe the the whole "they didn't get together during the series" thing, because from my POV, by the end, they live together and have spent half the show saying "I love you" to each other. It might be fraught, but all new and newish and intense things are. They're also not stupid or incapable of listening to the other's words. (As for the timing, well, before the bomb scene, though something that comes before that might push it beyond even that.) The meta I linked above talked about coding; to me, there is no coding: the love is explicitly text.
(I am also part foreign. This means I have a huge, constant desire to verbalize my love and caring, but the words never make it to my mouth. I am reasonably certain this – conflict? is also present in my writing. But some things are never meant to be said.)
(More notes: there was a lot of talk about what slash is for, which to be is a bit nonsensical as a question – slash is a category of fanfic, and fic isn't for one single thing. This was an interesting generational divide!)
Then I thought some more about it, and I think I lost the intermediate stepping stones, but what I came at was: expressions of love. IDK how it is in America, but here, no-one says "I love you". Affection and care is turning up, cooking, talking about tractors. We are an emotionally constipated people.
Ah yes, now I remember the bridge for the donkey-cart of thought! It was related to the actions of characters versus the internal monologue. So: I guess that the line in the sand I draw is that the characters' actions remain as in canon, but the act of fic-writing for a visual medium is already decoding some of that everything. As long as the characters' actions are as in canon, the internal monologue can be filled in at will. (It's a bit different for text-based things that are from the canon narrator's POV. But there we have a clearer target to emulate.)
And because this is a post composed of thread-ends I can't quite weave into a blanket, let me bring in Guardian as well! Some of this is probably my personal cultural baggage, as I'm not Chinese, but I honestly never could believe the the whole "they didn't get together during the series" thing, because from my POV, by the end, they live together and have spent half the show saying "I love you" to each other. It might be fraught, but all new and newish and intense things are. They're also not stupid or incapable of listening to the other's words. (As for the timing, well, before the bomb scene, though something that comes before that might push it beyond even that.) The meta I linked above talked about coding; to me, there is no coding: the love is explicitly text.
(I am also part foreign. This means I have a huge, constant desire to verbalize my love and caring, but the words never make it to my mouth. I am reasonably certain this – conflict? is also present in my writing. But some things are never meant to be said.)
no subject
Date: 2019-12-20 08:52 (UTC)I'm not sure that this is emotionally constipated, just that emotions get expressed differently? Why privilege speech over action?
(Have an icon where expression of love consists of a gift of two fat, stolen chickens.)
no subject
Date: 2019-12-20 10:40 (UTC)Wasn't the meta about narration, rather than characters expressing things? So the cold prickly narration would have no mentions of romance feelings, while the warm fuzzy narrative would write them out. Unless I misunderstood the meta? *g*
(I'm also more and more unsure of where, exactly, I fall. Probably not on the warm fuzzy end, if only due to my genre preferences?)
Because we also don't go for Big Actions? Quietness over loudness in emotional expression, etc. (Not that I claim to know the precise definition of emotional constipation. We do seem to be unable to get the emotions out.)
Hee! :D