(But! The Guardian rewatchalong has yet to end. Episode 35, with time travel talk!)
Observation of the day: Other people seem to have a much higher tolerance for fairytale endings than I do; I find a lot of the more wish-fulfillment-y ones unrealistic and prefer stuff like "no matter what the rules are, you can live happily within them" to "if the author likes you, the rules will go out the window for your HEA". Perhaps primarily because the former is a thing that can happen while the latter is not applicable to reality.
(By "the rules go out the window", I mean stuff like e.g. a slash ship in a royalty arranged marriage AU in a world where there is no mpreg, no sexual nonexclusivity to create an heir with a concubine, and no stuff to handwave away the lack of biokid heirs, whether that be worldbuilding so that the monarchy is nonhereditary or simply a mention of there being a convenient nephew for them to adopt. There are lots and lots of other ways to go full fairytale in a fashion that I find unbelievable, but this scenario is perhaps the easiest to explain.)
Observation of the day: Other people seem to have a much higher tolerance for fairytale endings than I do; I find a lot of the more wish-fulfillment-y ones unrealistic and prefer stuff like "no matter what the rules are, you can live happily within them" to "if the author likes you, the rules will go out the window for your HEA". Perhaps primarily because the former is a thing that can happen while the latter is not applicable to reality.
(By "the rules go out the window", I mean stuff like e.g. a slash ship in a royalty arranged marriage AU in a world where there is no mpreg, no sexual nonexclusivity to create an heir with a concubine, and no stuff to handwave away the lack of biokid heirs, whether that be worldbuilding so that the monarchy is nonhereditary or simply a mention of there being a convenient nephew for them to adopt. There are lots and lots of other ways to go full fairytale in a fashion that I find unbelievable, but this scenario is perhaps the easiest to explain.)
no subject
Date: 2019-11-16 15:16 (UTC)Ah, yeah, a narrative kink! I admit I don't share the kink for setting change AUs, either. (A bunch of the modern AU ones I've read are also deeply OOC because of the thing you mention: character X would never be content as a Starbucks barista without at the very least some ambitions of getting out of there, etc.)
Probably! The more one knows, the more one can notice the discrepancies and missed opportunities.
Plus eleventy billion. Worldbuilding is wonderful, but it's also reasonably easy to do the minimal handwaving that results in an impression that the characters have thought it through.
no subject
Date: 2019-11-17 01:57 (UTC)Plus eleventy billion. Worldbuilding is wonderful, but it's also reasonably easy to do the minimal handwaving that results in an impression that the characters have thought it through.
Yes. I'd add that what's most important is that the author has thought it through - no matter how much or how little explanation makes it into the fic, the author should have worked out the basic problems and how they were solved. If the author is working from a plan, the fic will have internal logic that holds up through the fic, even if the solutions happened offscreen. If not, they're probably going to trip up somewhere and give out conflicting information or leave gaps in the plot.
no subject
Date: 2019-11-17 19:32 (UTC)+1 I ran into it a lot in MDZS fandom – though to be fair, a lot of the allegedly canon setting fic also had very ... interesting characterization choices.
Oh, yes, this, definitely! Forays of fandoms past have revealed that there are people who don't even think about thinking it through; after getting started in Vorkosigan fandom, it was quite a shock. :P (Hm, this is probably also part of what underpins my dislike of Trope Product fic, where there's a trope that comes with a plot already and then that plot is hewed to to the beat,
scarcely more than a search-and-replace needed *g*The lack of thinking leaves the plot with gaps or conflicts in the information.)